Vidste du, at langt fra alle resultater i de mange Kundetilfredshedsundersøgelser man bliver mødt med er ens? Ikke engang tæt på!
For at skabe en kundetilfredshedsundersøgelse, der er retfærdig, er der en række ting, du skal overveje – fra formulering af spørgsmålene, til svarmuligheder, til indsamlingsmetoden.
For at få et realistisk og troværdigt datamateriale, er det som du kan læse her nedenfor, vigtigt at man er opmærksom på dem alle.
Læs her nogle gode råd fra vores samarbejdspartner Virtuatel, der er specialister med mere end 20 års erfaring på området.
When we came across this survey recently, from an organisation that suggests they will improve customer satisfaction overnight – and we realised how, as we immediately recognised a skewed rating system. Have a look for yourself, and see if you can figure out how the 9.2 review score was calculated.
Well, from left to right, the smiley faces are apportioned 2.5 points, 5, 7.5 and 10 points. And those smiley faces seem to indicate unhappy, neutral, happy and delighted (although there’s not actually an explanation as to whether that’s the case). Does that seem fair?
Probably not, and it raises a number of interesting points.
The first is that you can see two positive reactions, but just one negative and one neutral position. So, users are already pushed towards positive feedback, by virtue of two of the four options being positive.
In fact, if you rate something using Smile 2 (‘neutral’), you’re actually awarding 5 out of 10 points. If you didn’t look closely at that picture, you might assume that given its placement it would indicate ‘quite dissatisfied’, which definitely wouldn’t warrant 5/10 to the average user!
At VIRTUATell, if we’re using a four-point scale, we use 0, 3.3, 6.6 and 10 as the points for each position. This allows for the reviewer to indicate that something is so bad they wouldn’t award any points, and is a much more realistic way of measuring satisfaction.
Four-point scales are intrinsically problematic though, as there is no middle position to allow users to show that they are neither satisfied nor dissatisfied. Not allowing customers to adopt a neutral position does force them to pick a position, but in the case of this scale, where the positions are weighted towards the positive, this won’t give an accurate assessment of customer satisfaction.
The other issue with this survey is that there’s no way of showing that any of the questions aren’t relevant for this user. For instance, perhaps the user didn’t make use of the facilities, or didn’t have any interactions with the staff – they should be able to complete the survey without being forced to have an opinion on these things!
Perhaps you’ve already worked out why this survey is designed in this way…
Rather than trying to gather realistic data that the company will use to improve its offering, the results of this survey are used for review purposes and shown to website visitors – in this case, people booking hotels online. So, a high score gives the impression of hundreds of satisfied customers, and more chance of a booking by the potential customer!
But while this might work for first purchase on-site conversion rates, ultimately this strategy is risky. After all, if you visit a hotel based on a 9.5 rating, but go there and have a 5.5 experience, you may accept that it is “just you” but if it happens repeatedly, will you book with that company again? Probably not!
As you can see, survey design needs to be done carefully, and while it might be tempting to skew the results so that you get positive feedback, that, ultimately, won’t help your business.
Er du interesseret i en uddybende snak om, hvorvidt I får et troværdigt billede af jeres kunders tilfredshed, så giv endelig et ring på 7022 3638 eller send en mail
Synes du dette var en interessant artikel, så tilmeld dig vores nyhedsbrev her til højre på siden.
- Det gode, det dårlige og det ubalancerede survey-svar.
- Hvordan undersøger I kunderejsen ?
- 5 Easy Ways to Avoid Survey Fatigue
- – Vi kan ikke bare sætte en båndoptager i gang
- Farvel til ”lykke og fromme” – goddag til systematik og udvikling
- En syv trins guide til Quality Monitoring Program
- Værktøj til udvikling – ikke til kontrol